Beyond evidence versus truthiness: toward a symmetrical approach to knowledge and ignorance in policy studies

Item Type

Abstract

Current political developments in established liberal democracies in both Europe and North America have fundamentally called into question the normative relations between truth, knowledge and politics. Whether labeled “posttruth” or truthiness, commentators lament the willful spread and deployment of nonknowledge and ignorance as important political forces. In this paper, we discuss ignorance in its strategic dimension by weaving together insights from the sociology of ignorance with a policy-scientific approach. By means of three empirical vignettes, we demonstrate that ignorance is more than the flipside of knowledge or merely its lack: it is a constitutive feature of the policy process and is thus not uniquely symptomatic of the current era. We conclude by arguing for what we call a symmetrical approach in which ignorance receives the same quality of attention that knowledge has historically received in the policy sciences. To make fully visible the different forms of ignorance that shape policy processes, policy scholars must hone their “agnoto-epistemological sensibilities” to cope with the current challenges and advance a policy science for democracy. © 2019, The Author(s).

Subject

Ignorance
Knowledge
Agnotology
Critical policy studies
Evidence-based policy
Policy sciences
Posttruth

Publication Title

Publication Year

2019

Publication Date

2019

Source

Scopus

License

Physical Description

vol. 52, n. 2, pp. 299-314

Short Title

Beyond evidence versus truthiness

Citer cette ressource

Beyond evidence versus truthiness: toward a symmetrical approach to knowledge and ignorance in policy studies, dans Science & Ignorance, consulté le 21 Novembre 2024, https://ignorancestudies.inist.fr/s/science-ignorance/item/4596

Export