If the Facts Were Not Untruths, Their Implications Were: Sponsorship Bias and Misleading Communication

Item Type

Author

Language

English

Abstract

Sponsorship bias occurs when the financial interests of funders of scientific research influence claims made by scientists, especially in peer-reviewed publications. This article examines the relationship between sponsorship bias and misleading claims, understood as claims that are not necessarily false but which encourage those exposed to them to infer false conclusions. Misleading claims are relevant to how the term "bias" should be understood and thereby to evaluating a recent dispute about whether there is evidence of sponsorship bias in clinical research on statins. The concept of inferential asymmetry is introduced as an aid for understanding the relationship between misleading claims and sponsorship bias.

Subject

Humans
Bias
Conflict of Interest
Drug Industry
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Deception
Financial Support
Paroxetine
Research Personnel

Publication Year

2018

Publication Date

2018

Journal abreviation

Kennedy Inst Ethics J

Source

PMID: 30100597PubMed

License

ISSN

1054-6863

Physical Description

vol. 28, n. 2, pp. 119-144

Short Title

If the Facts Were Not Untruths, Their Implications Were

Citer cette ressource

If the Facts Were Not Untruths, Their Implications Were: Sponsorship Bias and Misleading Communication, dans Science & Ignorance, consulté le 21 Novembre 2024, https://ignorancestudies.inist.fr/s/science-ignorance/item/4924

Export