If the Facts Were Not Untruths, Their Implications Were: Sponsorship Bias and Misleading Communication
Item Type
Author
Language
English
Abstract
Sponsorship bias occurs when the financial interests of funders of scientific research influence claims made by scientists, especially in peer-reviewed publications. This article examines the relationship between sponsorship bias and misleading claims, understood as claims that are not necessarily false but which encourage those exposed to them to infer false conclusions. Misleading claims are relevant to how the term "bias" should be understood and thereby to evaluating a recent dispute about whether there is evidence of sponsorship bias in clinical research on statins. The concept of inferential asymmetry is introduced as an aid for understanding the relationship between misleading claims and sponsorship bias.
Subject
Humans
Bias
Conflict of Interest
Drug Industry
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Deception
Financial Support
Paroxetine
Research Personnel
Publication Title
Publication Year
2018
Publication Date
2018
Journal abreviation
Kennedy Inst Ethics J
Source
PMID: 30100597PubMed
License
ISSN
1054-6863
Link Attachment
Physical Description
vol. 28, n. 2, pp. 119-144
Short Title
If the Facts Were Not Untruths, Their Implications Were